As I have mentioned here before, I got a new camera for my birthday in October. My trusty old Nikon point-and-shoot from the early days of digital cameras was dying, and my very generous boyfriend bought me the a new Nikon S200. Though it is tiny, beautiful and red, I think Nikon definitely went for form over function on this one. I am not great photographer; I don’t have a fancy SLR and don’t expect fancy results from a basic camera. But I thought the whole point of point-and-shoots was that, for example, you can hand such a camera to your dog training instructor in a well lit store and get a photo of your dog’s graduation from puppy class that, while not a stunning photograph, will at least not be blurry:

But apparently I was wrong. The camera has about a billion settings, and if you are willing to fiddle with them for 20 minutes, you can usually find one that works okay. Most of my photographic subjects (cats, dogs and boyfriends) are sadly not willing to stay in cute poses for 20 minutes while I experiment with the bewildering array of settings.
So I have been experimenting with touching up photos after the fact. I use GIMP sometimes, and it is very powerful, but that’s another case of a bewildering array of settings. The other day, I wanted to make a collage of photos for my webpage, and a little googling told me that collage-making is not really what GIMP is made out for. One webpage suggested using Picasa, image organizing/editing software made by Google, that is available for Linux (and Windows, if you are into that sort of thing) and is capable of making collages.
It turns out Picasa is good for a lot of stuff other than making collages (which it occurs to me now I could have just done with open office or some such). When I first opened it, it found and chronologically organized all the photos on my computer (which included a lot of crap that comes with the operating system or other programs… but you can pretty simply select which folders you want it to consider), which is way cool all by itself. It also has some pretty handy image alteration options. It is not as powerful as Photoshop or GIMP, but it is way simpler. One awesome feature is the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button that will automatically adjust various features of your photo for you. Most of the time, I think it improves the photo. But, like googling, you can usually do a little better without the “I’m feeling lucky” button. For example, take this photo of two of the men in my life playing in the snow:

I think when I first took this picture, I thought it looked pretty cute. But now it looks like crap compared to the new and improved version:

There is a soft-focus feature that gives this kind of blah photo of me and Oliver:

The look of an Olan-Mills school photo:

Not that that is really a good thing.